Under the new rules, which are due to take effect on February 22, six new countries — including Eritrea, Nigeria, Sudan and Tanzania, as well as Kyrgyzstan and Myanmar — will face various visa restrictions. Unlike President Donald Trump’s 2017 travel ban, which sparked outrage around the world for primarily targeting Muslims, it is not a total travel ban. Nationals from Sudan and Tanzania will be banned from participating in the diversity visa lottery scheme, while visas which can lead to permanent residency will no longer be issued to Nigerians and Eritreans.
The decision to reduce service fee for patents, utility models and industrial designs for students, research centres and…70 Views | the publication reaches you by | Oman News
However, opposition leader Atiku Abubakar was more forthcoming in his response, saying the US should instead “consider adopting measures that individually target those in government who have failed in their duties, rather than target the entire Nigerian population.”
The government of Eritrea also denounced the measures as an “unfriendly act,” with the Ministry of Information branding the ban a political move that ignores Eritrea’s own attempts to stop what it called “automatic asylum” and “systematic depopulation” of the country.
Citizens concerned about the impact of ban
On the streets of Dar es Salaam, Tanzanians told DW of their uncertainty for the future following the announcement of the ban.
“I am surprised and disappointed by what the US has done,” Tom Juma, a businessman who sells second-hand clothes, said. “Some of us would like to go to the US to do business with other people. If the [leaders]are having problems they should sort them out, don’t bring it here where it will affect normal citizens.”
Local resident Emmanuel Eliazary said while the decision won’t impact him, other Tanzanians were likely to bear the brunt.
“My activities are based here, and I have no projects in the US, only in East Africa,” he said, “I think I can’t be affected by the US’s decision but those who do their business there [will be.]”
Meanwhile, in Nigeria’s capital Abuja, security risk management expert Kibir Adamou, thinks the US government has a valid point when it comes to concerns over data security.
“It will force the Nigerian government to improve its data management processes,” he told DW. “A lot of what the US government is asking us to do it for the good of Nigeria. The only part I am not comfortable with is the master-servant relationship [when it comes to] diplomacy. It’s all about reciprocity. If the US is asking us to share information with them, they should also be able to share information with us.”
Business development professional Mohammed thinks the US will ultimately pay the price for the travel ban. “America is built and sustained by foreigners, by people who have talents and who go there to help their economy,” he told DW. “If you cut that, it’s going to affect you adversely. It’s not something you will see immediately, but in the long run, it’s going to change the US, whether it likes it or not.
A racially-motivated policy?
US officials have remained ambiguous as to the reasoning behind adding the countries to the list, claiming they failed to meet US intelligence-sharing standards or lacked updated passport systems.
Matthew T. Page, an analyst with the Africa program at Chatham House, thinks the only logical explanation for the ban has little to do with security issues, or even an anti-Islamic policy.
“The reasoning has to do with policies we’ve seen over the past few years of tightening US immigration standards, especially towards countries from Africa and the Middle East,” he told DW. “I think these fit into the administration’s racially motivated immigration policy rather than for pressing security reasons.”
According to US Census Bureau data, Africa has the fastest-growing number of immigrants in the US, with Nigerians making up the largest group within this population.
“[Nigerian Americans] are a very successful class of immigrants,” says Page. “Over 29% of Nigerian Americans over the age of 25 hold a graduate degree, which is significantly higher than the rest of the US population, where only 11% of Americans hold a graduate degree. So, [the ban] is not because they don’t already have a presence in the US and aren’t already making a contribution to society…That really only leaves one explanation.”
In a significant endorsement that will support exports to European Union (EU) markets, Oman’s largest cement manufacturer, Raysut…454 Views | the publication reaches you by | Oman News
Do you have information you want to reach our readers?